On 10/07/2014 08:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
This is in preparation for clock providers to not have to deal with struct clk.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.viz...@collabora.com>
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-programmable.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-kona.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 9 +++++----
drivers/clk/clk.c | 11 +++++++----
drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c | 2 +-
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-ar100.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/clk-provider.h | 4 ++--
10 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
What is this based on? I see one in arch/mips/alchemy/common/clock.c as
well.
Can you also update Documentation/clk.txt please?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
