Hi Kever,

again authorship please :-) .

Also my original patch did include a change to document the new rockchip,pmu 
property in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt which should of 
course be again included here.


Heiko

Am Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014, 14:26:07 schrieb Kever Yang:
> Makes it possible to define a rockchip,pmu phandle in the cpus node directly
> referencing the pmu syscon instead of searching for specific compatible.
> 
> The old way of finding the pmu stays of course available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - add this patch
> 
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c index 4c36fbf..57b53b3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,19 @@ static int __init rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu(void)
>       struct device_node *node;
>       void __iomem *pmu_base;
> 
> +     /*
> +      * This function is only called via smp_ops->smp_prepare_cpu().
> +      * That only happens if a "/cpus" device tree node exists
> +      * and has an "enable-method" property that selects the SMP
> +      * operations defined herein.
> +      */
> +     node = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
> +
> +     pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(node, "rockchip,pmu");
> +     of_node_put(node);
> +     if (!IS_ERR(pmu))
> +             return 0;
> +
>       pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("rockchip,rk3066-pmu");
>       if (!IS_ERR(pmu))
>               return 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to