On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:49:56PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > I'm not sure about s390 nor have the machine, so it is very helpful if you > give us a command line level test and show us the result with this patch :) > Fortunately, we already have ftracetest under tools/tesitng/selftest/ftrace/. > You can add the testcase for checking co-existence of kprobes and ftrace on > an entry of a function.
FWIW, I was also surprised to see that the order of the ftrace testcases is not sorted. Maybe you might consider the patch below as well: >From a659098f63f188e603316e4c4ccb435bf360987a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:08:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ftracetest: sort testcases Make sure the order of the executed testcases is always the same. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> --- tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest index a8f81c782856..2007a2cde56f 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ abspath() { } find_testcases() { #directory - echo `find $1 -name \*.tc` + echo `find $1 -name \*.tc | sort` } parse_opts() { # opts -- 1.8.5.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
