On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:57:09PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Hm I haven't seen the code yet, but is perhaps the NUMA scanning working > similarly enough that a single scanner could handle both the NUMA and THP > bits to save time?
IIRC the THP thing doesn't need the fault thing, which makes it an entirely different beast. Then again, we do walk the actual page-tables through change_protection, but changing that means we have to duplicate all that code, then again, maybe the current THP stuff already carries something like that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
