Em Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:46:03PM -0600, James Bottomley escreveu: > Well, this is a brown paper bag for someone. The new protocol
/me using such bag now :( Thanks a lot for the fix. David, Please apply. > registration locking uses a rwlock to limit access to the protocol list. > Unfortunately, the initialisation: > > static rwlock_t proto_list_lock; > > Only works to initialise the lock as unlocked on platforms whose unlock > signal is all zeros. On other platforms, they think it's already locked > and hang forever. > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ===== net/core/sock.c 1.67 vs edited ===== > --- 1.67/net/core/sock.c 2005-03-26 17:04:35 -06:00 > +++ edited/net/core/sock.c 2005-04-02 13:37:20 -06:00 > @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_common_release); > > -static rwlock_t proto_list_lock; > +static DEFINE_RWLOCK(proto_list_lock); > static LIST_HEAD(proto_list); > > int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
