On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:25:01 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Gracefully handle failure to write device status.
> We really should handle other errors as well, but this one is needed for
> virtio 1.0 compliance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> index a994078..26e737c 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> @@ -862,7 +862,9 @@ static u8 virtio_ccw_get_status(struct virtio_device 
> *vdev)
>  static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
>  {
>       struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
> +     u8 old_status = vcdev->status;

*vcdev->status

>       struct ccw1 *ccw;
> +     int ret;
> 
>       ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!ccw)
> @@ -874,7 +876,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device 
> *vdev, u8 status)
>       ccw->flags = 0;
>       ccw->count = sizeof(status);
>       ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)vcdev->status;
> -     ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> +     ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> +     /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> +     if (ret)
> +             *vcdev->status = old_status;

If we fail the write, ccw->cda should be unchanged; but this doesn't
hurt.

>       kfree(ccw);
>  }
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to