On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:26:32PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> I also noticed that this is missing:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index e12e5b0..7db5ab9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -614,3 +614,9 @@ static int __init byt_gpio_init(void)
> }
>
> subsys_initcall(byt_gpio_init);
> +
> +static void __exit byt_gpio_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&byt_gpio_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(byt_gpio_exit);
But the Baytrail driver is not a loadable module, it is bool:
config PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL
bool "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control"
depends on GPIOLIB && ACPI && X86
(...)
So I guess it won't need handling for removal, as it can only
be compiled-in.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
