On 28.10.2014 21:49, David Miller wrote:
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:08:59 +0200
Do not add phy include to the board file but platform_data include
instead.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com>
---
David,
I should have compile tested this patch earlier. I did now on
pxa168_defconfig right after I received an 0-day kbuild error
on this patch.
This is the corresponding fix, can you please squash it in?
Thanks and sorry for the noise,
Patch applied to net-next, but:
1) There is never any way for me to "squash" a patch into an old
one. Once I apply a patch it is a permanent commit in my tree
and cannot be undone and/or modified.
Therefore the only thing you can do is send me a relative fix
and that's what shows up in my tree as yet another later commit.
Ok, good to know and sorry for the crippled fixup patch. I was assuming
that net-next is also rebased until pulled/moved to some stable state.
2) Always be specific about the target tree in you subject,
line. Never assume I can figure it out by context.
Also, sorry for the little information given.
Thanks,
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/