On 30/10/2014 at 15:43:43 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > On Thursday 30 October 2014 15:36:24 Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:15:34 +0100 > > Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > When building with device tree, ARCH_AT91RM9200 may not be selected. Allow > > > building that driver by also depending on ARCH_AT91. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> > > > > Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> > > > > Doesn't this reintroduce the bug fixed by commit 09549cd0172 ("watchdog: > Revert the AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG dependency")? > > At least in 3.18-rc2, the driver still uses at91_st_write/at91_st_read. >
Hum, right, then we have no better way to express that than depends on SOC_AT91RM9200, would that be acceptable ? -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
