When the TIF_SINGLESTEP tracee dequeues a signal, handle_signal()
clears TIF_FORCED_TF and X86_EFLAGS_TF but leaves TIF_SINGLESTEP set.

If the tracer does PTRACE_SINGLESTEP again, enable_single_step() sets
X86_EFLAGS_TF but not TIF_FORCED_TF. This means that the subsequent
PTRACE_CONT doesn't not clear X86_EFLAGS_TF, and the tracee gets the
wrong SIGTRAP.

Test-case (needs -O2 to avoid prologue insns in signal handler):

        #include <unistd.h>
        #include <stdio.h>
        #include <sys/ptrace.h>
        #include <sys/wait.h>
        #include <sys/user.h>
        #include <assert.h>
        #include <stddef.h>

        void handler(int n)
        {
                asm("nop");
        }

        int child(void)
        {
                assert(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0,0,0) == 0);
                signal(SIGALRM, handler);
                kill(getpid(), SIGALRM);
                return 0x23;
        }

        void *getip(int pid)
        {
                return (void*)ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, pid,
                                        offsetof(struct user, regs.rip), 0);
        }

        int main(void)
        {
                int pid, status;

                pid = fork();
                if (!pid)
                        return child();

                assert(wait(&status) == pid);
                assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGALRM);

                assert(ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, pid, 0, SIGALRM) == 0);
                assert(wait(&status) == pid);
                assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP);
                assert((getip(pid) - (void*)handler) == 0);

                assert(ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, pid, 0, SIGALRM) == 0);
                assert(wait(&status) == pid);
                assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP);
                assert((getip(pid) - (void*)handler) == 1);

                assert(ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0,0) == 0);
                assert(wait(&status) == pid);
                assert(WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status) == 0x23);

                return 0;
        }

The last assert() fails because PTRACE_CONT wrongly triggers another
single-step and X86_EFLAGS_TF can't be cleared by debugger until the
tracee does sys_rt_sigreturn().

Change handle_signal() to do user_disable_single_step() if stepping,
we do not need to preserve TIF_SINGLESTEP because we are going to do
ptrace_notify(), and it is simply wrong to leak this bit.

While at it, change the comment to explain why we also need to clear
TF unconditionally after setup_rt_frame().

Note: in the longer term we should probably change setup_sigcontext()
to use get_flags() and then just remove this user_disable_single_step().
And, the state of TIF_FORCED_TF can be wrong after restore_sigcontext()
which can set/clear TF, this needs another fix.

Reported-by: Evan Teran <ete...@alum.rit.edu>
Reported-by: Pedro Alves <pal...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c |   22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
index ed37a76..9d3a15b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
@@ -629,7 +629,8 @@ setup_rt_frame(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
 static void
 handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-       bool failed;
+       bool stepping, failed;
+
        /* Are we from a system call? */
        if (syscall_get_nr(current, regs) >= 0) {
                /* If so, check system call restarting.. */
@@ -653,12 +654,13 @@ handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
        }
 
        /*
-        * If TF is set due to a debugger (TIF_FORCED_TF), clear the TF
-        * flag so that register information in the sigcontext is correct.
+        * If TF is set due to a debugger (TIF_FORCED_TF), clear TF now
+        * so that register information in the sigcontext is correct and
+        * then notify the tracer before entering the signal handler.
         */
-       if (unlikely(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_TF) &&
-           likely(test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_FORCED_TF)))
-               regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
+       stepping = test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP);
+       if (stepping)
+               user_disable_single_step(current);
 
        failed = (setup_rt_frame(ksig, regs) < 0);
        if (!failed) {
@@ -669,10 +671,8 @@ handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
                 * it might disable possible debug exception from the
                 * signal handler.
                 *
-                * Clear TF when entering the signal handler, but
-                * notify any tracer that was single-stepping it.
-                * The tracer may want to single-step inside the
-                * handler too.
+                * Clear TF for the case when it wasn't set by debugger to
+                * avoid the recursive send_sigtrap() in SIGTRAP handler.
                 */
                regs->flags &= ~(X86_EFLAGS_DF|X86_EFLAGS_RF|X86_EFLAGS_TF);
                /*
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
                if (used_math())
                        drop_init_fpu(current);
        }
-       signal_setup_done(failed, ksig, test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP));
+       signal_setup_done(failed, ksig, stepping);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-- 
1.5.5.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to