On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 09:02 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > But the *code* changes > > you're making here that check whether bp_prefix is being duplicated > > aren't necessary for that, and are in fact confusing and dangerous. > > Understood, thanks for the review, hopefully this is addressed with the > latest series.
Actually, maybe you wanted these changes because you didn't want to end up with CONFIG_BACKPORT_BPAUTO_ for integration? I think that's a small price to pay though for code complexity trade-off, IMHO you should accept CONFIG_BACKPORT_BPAUTO_ and remove the code changes. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
