On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 06:57:27PM -0600, Jaime Arrocha wrote: > Correction of warnings of lines with 80 plus character. > The rest were left for better code readability > > Signed-off-by: Jaime Arrocha <jarroch...@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > b/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > index cff7cbe..d65fa92 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > @@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ > #include "slic.h" > > static uint slic_first_init = 1; > -static char *slic_banner = "Alacritech SLIC Technology(tm) Server " > - "and Storage Accelerator (Non-Accelerated)"; > +char *slic_banner = "Alacritech SLIC Technology(tm) Server and " > + "Storage Accelerator (Non-Accelerated)";
Why did you take away the 'static' marking here? And make this one full line please. > > static char *slic_proc_version = "2.0.351 2006/07/14 12:26:00"; > > @@ -498,12 +498,14 @@ static int slic_card_download(struct adapter *adapter) > slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs, > baseaddress + codeaddr, FLUSH); > /* Write out instruction to low addr */ > - slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs, instruction, > FLUSH); > + slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs, > + instruction, FLUSH); > instruction = *(u32 *)(fw->data + index); > index += 4; > > /* Write out instruction to high addr */ > - slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs, instruction, > FLUSH); > + slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_wcs, > + instruction, FLUSH); > instruction = *(u32 *)(fw->data + index); > index += 4; > } > @@ -1884,7 +1886,8 @@ static void slic_xmit_fail(struct adapter *adapter, > break; > case XMIT_FAIL_HOSTCMD_FAIL: > dev_err(&adapter->netdev->dev, > - "xmit_start skb[%p] type[%x] No host commands > available\n", skb, skb->pkt_type); > + "xmit_start skb[%p] type[%x] No host commands > available\n", > + skb, skb->pkt_type); > break; > } > } > @@ -2096,11 +2099,10 @@ static void slic_interrupt_card_up(u32 isr, struct > adapter *adapter, > } > } else if (isr & ISR_XDROP) { > dev_err(&dev->dev, > - "isr & ISR_ERR [%x] > ISR_XDROP\n", isr); > + "isr & ISR_ERR [%x] ISR_XDROP\n", isr); > } else { > dev_err(&dev->dev, > - "isr & ISR_ERR [%x]\n", > - isr); > + "isr & ISR_ERR [%x]\n", isr); > } > } > > @@ -2340,7 +2342,8 @@ static int slic_if_init(struct adapter *adapter) > SLIC_GET_ADDR_LOW(&pshmem->isr), FLUSH); > #else > slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_addr_upper, 0, DONT_FLUSH); > - slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_isp, (u32)&pshmem->isr, > FLUSH); > + slic_reg32_write(&slic_regs->slic_isp, > + (u32)&pshmem->isr, FLUSH); > #endif > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->bit64reglock.lock, > adapter->bit64reglock.flags); > @@ -2555,7 +2558,8 @@ static int slic_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct > ifreq *rq, int cmd) > > if (copy_from_user(data, rq->ifr_data, 28)) { > PRINT_ERROR > - ("slic: copy_from_user FAILED getting > initial simba param\n"); > + ("slic: copy_from_user FAILED getting" > + " initial simba param\n"); Never break a string across a line. > return -EFAULT; > } > > @@ -2570,7 +2574,8 @@ static int slic_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct > ifreq *rq, int cmd) > (tracemon_request == > SLIC_DUMP_IN_PROGRESS)) { > PRINT_ERROR > - ("ATK Diagnostic Trace Dump Requested but > already in progress... ignore\n"); > + ("ATK Diagnostic Trace Dump Requested" > + " but already in progress... ignore\n"); Same here, never do this. If you fix up the PRINT_ERROR() macros, you will not get checkpatch warnings. But that's not a real issue, this driver has so many other problems... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/