On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Kay Sievers wrote: > Sure, but seems I need to ask again: What is the exact reason not to implement > the muticast message multiplexing/subscription part of the connector as a > generic part of netlink? That would be nice to have and useful for other > subsystems too as an option to the current broadcast.
This is a good point, in general, consider generically extending Netlink itself instead of creating these separate things. - James -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
