On Thursday 07 April 2005 11:10, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Do you have it automated to the point where processing emailed patches > > involves little more overhead than doing a bk pull? > > It's more overhead, but not a lot. Especially nice numbered sequences like > Andrew sends (where I don't have to manually try to get the dependencies > right by trying to figure them out and hope I'm right, but instead just > sort by Subject: line)...
Hi Linus, In that case, a nice refinement is to put the sequence number at the end of the subject line so patch sequences don't interleave: Subject: [PATCH] Unbork OOM Killer (1 of 3) Subject: [PATCH] Unbork OOM Killer (2 of 3) Subject: [PATCH] Unbork OOM Killer (3 of 3) Subject: [PATCH] Unbork OOM Killer (v2, 1 of 3) Subject: [PATCH] Unbork OOM Killer (v2, 2 of 3) ... Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
