On Sun, 9 Nov 2014 18:50:19 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux <[email protected]> wrote:
> What this then means is that it fundamentally undermines the idea of > storing the pointer to a device_node as a const pointer, as the device > node must always be modified when you're done with it (because it's a > ref-counted structure.) So, having it const in your code is a bug. > > What this also means is that every other place that you've added const > below is also very dubious. Thanks for the explanation. The correct patch will be simpler: in the ASoC structures, I found only three places where the device_node pointer is const. -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
