On 11/09/2014 10:55 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Alexey Charkov <alch...@gmail.com> wrote:

+       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+       if (!res) {
+               ret = -ENODEV;
+               goto fail1;
You could save this NULL check...

+       }
         mmc = mmc_alloc_host(sizeof(struct wmt_mci_priv), &pdev->dev);
         if (!mmc) {
                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to allocate mmc_host\n");
@@ -813,7 +819,7 @@ static int wmt_mci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
         if (of_get_property(np, "cd-inverted", NULL))
                 priv->cd_inverted = 1;

-       priv->sdmmc_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
If you move ' res = platform_get_resource' right here as
devm_ioremap_resource() already does the NULL check.

+       priv->sdmmc_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
         if (!priv->sdmmc_base) {
                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map IO space\n");
                 ret = -ENOMEM;
This was the original intention but it would fall between the failX jumps, i discussed that with Alexey and we decided to change it with the cleanup to hold this patch small.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to