On 11/10/2014 11:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:48:27PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >> [ 829.539183] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#10, trinity-c594/11067 >> [ 829.539203] lock: 0xffff880631dd6b80, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: >> trinity-c594/11067, .owner_cpu: 13 > > Ooh, look at that. CPU#10 vs .owner_cpu: 13 on the _same_ task. > > One of those again :/
Hum. I missed that one. Hold on, but the magic here is fine and the owner pointer is fine, why would just the owner cpu be wrong? Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
