On Tuesday 07 October 2014 17:06:47 Feng Kan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> index 2e45ae3..a03042c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> @@ -1009,6 +1009,15 @@ config I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL
>         connected there. This will work whatever the interface used to
>         talk to the EC (SPI, I2C or LPC).
>  
> +config I2C_XGENE_SLIMPRO
> +     tristate "APM X-Gene SoC I2C SLIMpro devices support"
> +     depends on ARCH_XGENE && XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX

Why this dependency on XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX?

Better replace it with a dependency on MAILBOX.

> +     } else {
> +             spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> +             ctx->i2c_rx_poll = 1;
> +             for (count = SLIMPRO_I2C_WAIT_COUNT; count > 0; count--) {
> +                     if (ctx->i2c_rx_poll == 0)
> +                             break;
> +                     udelay(100);
> +             }

No, you can't block the CPU for an extended amount of time with
interrupts disabled. Please kill this code.

> +     ctx->resp_msg = data;
> +     if (ctx->mbox_client.tx_block)
> +             init_completion(&ctx->rd_complete);

reinit_completion()?

> +static int slimpro_i2c_blkrd(struct slimpro_i2c_dev *ctx, u32 chip, u32 addr,
> +                             u32 addrlen, u32 protocol, u32 readlen,
> +                             u32 with_data_len, void *data)
> +{
> +     dma_addr_t paddr;
> +     u32 msg[3];
> +     int rc;
> +
> +     paddr = dma_map_single(ctx->dev, ctx->dma_buffer, readlen,
> +                            DMA_FROM_DEVICE);

ctx->dev is probably the wrong device here. The i2c controller is not
DMA capable itself, you need to have a pointer to the device that actually
performs the DMA here.


> +     /* Request mailbox channel */
> +     cl->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +     cl->rx_callback = slimpro_i2c_rx_cb;
> +     cl->tx_done = slimpro_i2c_tx_done;
> +     cl->tx_block = true;
> +     cl->tx_tout = SLIMPRO_OP_TO_MS;
> +     cl->knows_txdone = false;
> +     cl->chan_name = "i2c-slimpro";
> +     ctx->mbox_chan = mbox_request_channel(cl);

This is not the correct interface.

> +     rc = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> +     if (rc)
> +             dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Unable to set dma mask\n");

Are you sure that this is the correct device to perform the DMA?

Moreover, the mask doesn't match the usage: the slimpro_i2c_blkrd
function passes in only the lower 32 bit of the address, which would
be DMA_BIT_MASK(32).

> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static struct of_device_id xgene_slimpro_i2c_id[] = {
> +     {.compatible = "apm,xgene-slimpro-i2c" },
> +     {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xgene_slimpro_i2c_dt_ids);
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct platform_driver xgene_slimpro_i2c_driver = {
> +     .probe  = xgene_slimpro_i2c_probe,
> +     .remove = xgene_slimpro_i2c_remove,
> +     .driver = {
> +             .name   = XGENE_SLIMPRO_I2C,
> +             .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
> +             .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(xgene_slimpro_i2c_id)
> +     },
> +};

The driver only supports DT, so just drop the #ifdef and the of_match_ptr().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to