3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

commit 9378c6768e4fca48971e7b6a9075bc006eda981d upstream.

When there are no meta block groups update_backups() will compute the
backup block in 32-bit arithmetics thus possibly overflowing the block
number and corrupting the filesystem. OTOH filesystems without meta
block groups larger than 16 TB should be rare. Fix the problem by doing
the counting in 64-bit arithmetics.

Coverity-id: 741252
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/ext4/resize.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static void update_backups(struct super_
                        break;
 
                if (meta_bg == 0)
-                       backup_block = group * bpg + blk_off;
+                       backup_block = ((ext4_fsblk_t)group) * bpg + blk_off;
                else
                        backup_block = (ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) +
                                        ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group));


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to