On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> v2:
>>>  - added call to free_init_pages(), as suggested by tglx
>
>> something is wrong:
>>
>> [    7.842479] Freeing unused kernel memory: 3844K (ffffffff82e52000 -
>> ffffffff83213000)
>> [    7.843305] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 28672k
>
> ....
> should use attached one instead.
>
> 1. should use _brk_end instead of &end, as we only use partial of
>    brk.
> 2. [_brk_end, pm_end) page range is already converted. aka
>    is not wasted.

Are you sure? For me, _brk_end isn't far enough:

[    1.475572] all_end: 0xffffffff82df5000
[    1.476736] _brk_end: 0xffffffff82dd6000

>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -1124,7 +1124,8 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>      unsigned long end = (unsigned long) &__end_rodata_hpage_align;
>      unsigned long text_end = PFN_ALIGN(&__stop___ex_table);
>      unsigned long rodata_end = PFN_ALIGN(&__end_rodata);
> -    unsigned long all_end = PFN_ALIGN(&_end);
> +    unsigned long all_end = PFN_ALIGN(_brk_end);
> +    unsigned long pmd_end = roundup(all_end, PMD_SIZE);
>
>      printk(KERN_INFO "Write protecting the kernel read-only data: %luk\n",
>             (end - start) >> 10);
> @@ -1136,7 +1137,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>       * The rodata/data/bss/brk section (but not the kernel text!)
>       * should also be not-executable.
>       */
> -    set_memory_nx(rodata_start, (all_end - rodata_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +    set_memory_nx(rodata_start, (pmd_end - rodata_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>
>      rodata_test();
>
> @@ -1148,6 +1149,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>      set_memory_ro(start, (end-start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>  #endif
>
> +    /* all_end to pmd_end is handled via free_all_bootmem() */
>      free_init_pages("unused kernel",
>              (unsigned long) __va(__pa_symbol(text_end)),
>              (unsigned long) __va(__pa_symbol(rodata_start)));

This patch produces the same results as my v1 patch:

0xffffffff8202d000-0xffffffff82200000  1868K     RW       GLB NX pte
0xffffffff82200000-0xffffffff82e00000    12M     RW   PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffffffff82e00000-0xffffffffc0000000   978M                     pmd

Is this correct? It sounded like tglx wanted the pmd split, like this:

0xffffffff82200000-0xffffffff82c00000    10M     RW   PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffffffff82c00000-0xffffffff82df5000  2004K     RW       GLB NX pte
0xffffffff82df5000-0xffffffff82e00000    44K     RW           NX pte
0xffffffff82e00000-0xffffffffc0000000   978M                     pmd


-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to