2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Hurley <[email protected]>

Kernel oops can cause the tty to be unreleaseable (for example, if
n_tty_read() crashes while on the read_wait queue). This will cause
tty_release() to endlessly loop without sleeping.

Use a killable sleep timeout which grows by 2n+1 jiffies over the interval
[0, 120 secs.) and then jumps to forever (but still killable).

NB: killable just allows for the task to be rewoken manually, not
to be terminated.

Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 37b164578826406a173ca7c20d9ba7430134d23e)
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/char/tty_io.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
index 123cedf..cbdd169 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
@@ -1482,6 +1482,7 @@ void tty_release_dev(struct file *filp)
        int     devpts;
        int     idx;
        char    buf[64];
+       long    timeout = 0;
        struct  inode *inode;
 
        inode = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
@@ -1602,7 +1603,11 @@ void tty_release_dev(struct file *filp)
                printk(KERN_WARNING "tty_release_dev: %s: read/write wait queue 
"
                                    "active!\n", tty_name(tty, buf));
                mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
-               schedule();
+               schedule_timeout_killable(timeout);
+               if (timeout < 120 * HZ)
+                       timeout = 2 * timeout + 1;
+               else
+                       timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
        }
 
        /*
-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to