On 2014/11/12 21:42, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
>
> Add callback irq_compose_msi_msg to struct irq_chip, which will be used
> to support stacked irqchip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
> Cc: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.c...@mediatek.com>
> Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyij...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/irq.h | 5 +++++
> kernel/irq/chip.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index 0adcbbbf2e87..536b7fc6c8f4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct seq_file;
> struct module;
> struct irq_desc;
> struct irq_data;
> +struct msi_msg;
> typedef void (*irq_flow_handler_t)(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc);
> typedef void (*irq_preflow_handler_t)(struct irq_data *data);
> @@ -320,6 +321,7 @@ static inline irq_hw_number_t irqd_to_hwirq(struct
> irq_data *d)
> * any other callback related to this irq
> * @irq_release_resources: optional to release resources acquired with
> * irq_request_resources
> + * @irq_compose_msi_msg: optional to compose message content for MSI
> * @flags: chip specific flags
> */
> struct irq_chip {
> @@ -356,6 +358,8 @@ struct irq_chip {
> int (*irq_request_resources)(struct irq_data *data);
> void (*irq_release_resources)(struct irq_data *data);
>
> + void (*irq_compose_msi_msg)(struct irq_data *data, struct
> msi_msg *msg);
> +
> unsigned long flags;
> };
>
> @@ -443,6 +447,7 @@ extern void handle_percpu_devid_irq(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void handle_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq);
>
> +extern int irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg
> *msg);
> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> extern void irq_chip_ack_parent(struct irq_data *data);
> extern int irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(struct irq_data *data);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index 12f3e72449eb..8f362db17a8a 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -867,3 +867,20 @@ int irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(struct irq_data *data)
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
> #endif
> +
> +int irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct irq_data *pos = NULL;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> + for (; data; data = data->parent_data)
> +#endif
> + if (data->chip && data->chip->irq_compose_msi_msg)
> + pos = data;
> + if (!pos)
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +
> + pos->chip->irq_compose_msi_msg(pos, msg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Adding message composing routine to struct irq_chip is OK to me, and it should
be because it is interrupt controllers' duty to compose messages (so that they
can parse the messages correctly without any pre-defined rules that endpoint
devices absolutely need not to know).
However a problem comes out when deciding which parameters should be passed to
this routine. A message can associate with multiple interrupts, which makes me
think composing messages for each interrupt is not that appropriate. And we
can take a look at the new routine irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(). It is called by
msi_domain_activate() which will be called by irq_domain_activate_irq() in
irq_startup() for each interrupt descriptor, result in composing a message for
each interrupt, right? (Unless requiring a judge on the parameter @data when
implementing the irq_compose_msi_msg() callback that only compose message for
the first entry of that message. But I really don't like that...)
Regards,
Abel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
