3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Vince Weaver <[email protected]> commit 1996388e9f4e3444db8273bc08d25164d2967c21 upstream. This was discussed back in February: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/18/956 But I never saw a patch come out of it. On IvyBridge we share the SandyBridge cache event tables, but the dTLB-load-miss event is not compatible. Patch it up after the fact to the proper DTLB_LOAD_MISSES.DEMAND_LD_MISS_CAUSES_A_WALK Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.deb.2.11.1407141528200.17...@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Hou Pengyang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c @@ -2475,6 +2475,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void) case 62: /* IvyBridge EP */ memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids)); + /* dTLB-load-misses on IVB is different than SNB */ + hw_cache_event_ids[C(DTLB)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0x8108; /* DTLB_LOAD_MISSES.DEMAND_LD_MISS_CAUSES_A_WALK */ + memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snb_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs)); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
