On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > Sorry, I can't follow your argumentation here.
> >
> > pcpu_alloc()
> > ....
> > area_found:
> > ....
> >
> > /* clear the areas and return address relative to base address */
> > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > memset((void *)pcpu_chunk_addr(chunk, cpu, 0) + off, 0,
> > size);
> >
> > How would that memset fail to establish the mapping, which is
> > btw. already established via:
> >
> > pcpu_populate_chunk()
> >
> > already before that memset?
>
> I think that this will map them into init_mm->pgd and
> current->active_mm->pgd, but it won't necessarily map them into the
> rest of the pgds.
And why would mapping them into the kernel mapping, i.e. init_mm not
be sufficient?
We are talking about kernel memory and not some random user space
mapping.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
