On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:15:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > But I hope that I can get non-conflicting merges done fairly soon, and > > > maybe I can con James or Jeff or somebody to try out GIT then... > > > > I don't mind being a guinea pig as long as someone else does the hard > > work of finding a new way to merge :) > > So I can tell you what merges are going to be like, just to prepare you. > > First, the good news: I think we can make the workflow look like bk, ie > pretty much like "git pull" and "git push". And for well-behaved stuff > (ie minimal changes to the same files on both sides) it will even be fast. > I think.
If you can stick something meaningful in a simple text file, overwritten after each merge completes, similar to the BitKeeper/csets-in file, it should be trivial to write a wrapper for the basic merge tool that calls a trigger after each merge and uses csets-in to generate diffs and email them out. -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
