(please keep me on CC when replying)
Checking for NULL before calling kfree() on a pointer is redundant. This
patch drops such checks from arch/s390/
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
extmem.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -upr linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-orig/arch/s390/mm/extmem.c
linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/arch/s390/mm/extmem.c
--- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-orig/arch/s390/mm/extmem.c 2005-03-02
08:38:17.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/arch/s390/mm/extmem.c 2005-04-11 21:40:10.000000000
+0200
@@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ query_segment_type (struct dcss_segment
rc = 0;
out_free:
- if (qin) kfree(qin);
- if (qout) kfree(qout);
+ kfree(qin);
+ kfree(qout);
return rc;
}
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ __segment_load (char *name, int do_nonsh
segtype_string[seg->vm_segtype]);
goto out;
out_free:
- kfree (seg);
+ kfree(seg);
out:
return rc;
}
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ segment_modify_shared (char *name, int d
list_del(&seg->list);
dcss_diag(DCSS_PURGESEG, seg->dcss_name,
&dummy, &dummy);
- kfree (seg);
+ kfree(seg);
out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&dcss_lock);
return rc;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
