On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:12:34AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
> > - make needlessly global code static
> > - remove the following unused global functions:
> >   - blkdev_scsi_issue_flush_fn
> 
> Kill the function completely, it is not used anymore.
> 
> >   - __blk_attempt_remerge
> 
> Normally I would say leave that since it's part of the API, but lets
> just kill it. I don't envision any further users of the remerging
> attempts.
> 
> > - remove the following unused EXPORT_SYMBOL's:
> >   - blk_phys_contig_segment
> >   - blk_hw_contig_segment
> >   - blkdev_scsi_issue_flush_fn
> >   - __blk_attempt_remerge
> > 
> > Please review which of these changes make sense.
> 
> Looks fine to me, thanks. Can you send a new patch that kills
> blkdev_scsi_issue_flush_fn()?

I have a problem parsing your email.

Which parts of my patch are OK and which shouldn't be applied?
Or why do you want a separate blkdev_scsi_issue_flush_fn patch?

> Jens Axboe

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to