On Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:34:03 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > [...] > > > That said whether or not it is ever useful to set PM_RUNTIME alone is a good > > question. In my opinion it is useful today, at least on some platforms that > > don't really support system suspend or hibernation in any form. However, it > > may not be the case any more when suspend-to-idle becomes mature enough, > > because that should just work for any platform without any kind of special > > support. We're still missing some timekeeping bits there, but once that > > gap has been covered, we may just eliminate PM_SLEEP as well if there's a > > broad consensus on that. > > That's sounds like a good approach, thanks for sharing your ideas and plans. > > Feel free to add my reviewed-by tag to this patchset as well.
I'll do that, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
