On 11/30/2014 06:07 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 12:18:04PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> Use one looping instead of two, so can let code more simpler and get a >> little better performance. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> > > Performance? Please, this is vgic_create.... >
I guess your meaning is "this code is not performance sensitive", do not mean "1 looping can not get a little better performance than 2 looping". If what I guess is incorrect, please let me know. > This does nothing else than introduce churn. > I don't think it does nothing, it can let code simpler than before: remove the redundant looping -- the 2 looping do the same thing which is commented just above the firstly looping. And I don't know which churn this patch will introduce. At least, no one want to waste him/her time resources to intend churn, please provide more details about it. If kvm does not like me, or does not like members to find issues based on reading source code, please let me know (no reply means kvm does not like me or this way), I will quit, so can save time resources both. Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open share and attitude like air water and life which God blessed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
