From: zhang jun <[email protected]>

find_idlest_cpu return -1 is not reasonable, set default value to this_cpu.

Signed-off-by: zhang jun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Changcheng Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.14.25
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9b4c4f3..9d18887 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4151,7 +4151,7 @@ static int
 find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
 {
        unsigned long load, min_load = ULONG_MAX;
-       int idlest = -1;
+       int idlest = this_cpu;
        int i;
 
        /* Traverse only the allowed CPUs */
@@ -4284,7 +4284,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, 
int sd_flag, int wake_f
                }
 
                new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(group, p, cpu);
-               if (new_cpu == -1 || new_cpu == cpu) {
+               if (new_cpu == cpu) {
                        /* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of cpu */
                        sd = sd->child;
                        continue;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to