Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:18:56PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:49:52PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > Jiri Wrote: > > > > > looks ok to me.. > > > > > > > Thanks for the review. > > > > > > > > I'll test it once I get hands on Haswel server again, I guess we > > > > > wait for the kernel change to go in first anyway, right? > > > > > > > I'm not sure, let's ask Peter. > > > > > > > Peter? > > > > > > Would be good to go in one pull request, so that whoever pulls it has > > > the chance to test the kernel feature with the accompanying tooling bits. > > > > also there's user part dependency on kernel.. soem new define IIRC > > > > Oh, right. We have to let them go in together. > > Hi Peter,
The ones that are just prep patches I am merging now, Jiri, can I stick an Acked-by to the non-LBR related ones? > I have verified that the V8 kernel part patch is compatible with both latest > tip and latest perf/core. We don't need to rebase. > The user perf tool for tip is not updated yet. We need to merge latest > perf/core to tip before applying user part patch. > > Do you have more comments for the code? > > The latest kernel and user part codes are here. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/6/432 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/396 > > Thanks, > Kan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
