On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Tony Luck <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 03:52:10PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> Dunno. Tony and Borislav -- when do you want the IST stack switching >>> stuff? >> >> I'd leave that up to Tony and his testbench. I mean, we can hammer on >> it as much as we can and it can pass all testing locally but the real >> fun starts once it hits upstream and for that it doesn't matter which >> release... IMHO. > > So what was the net result of all the mode/RCU discussions? > > Do I need some extra magic incantations in the final version > of do_machine_check() beyond what was in this patch: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > to make everything happy? >
I think you need ist_begin_non_atomic() before local_irq_enable() and ist_end_non_atomic() after local_irq_disable(). Otherwise it should be good. --Andy > -Tony -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
