> > > > > /** A fuqueue, a prioritized wait queue usable from > kernel space. */ > > struct fuqueue { > > spinlock_t lock; > > struct plist wlist; > > struct fuqueue_ops *ops; > > }; > > > > Would the above spinlock_t be a raw_spinlock_t? This goes > back to my first question. I'm not sure how familiar you are > with Ingo's work, but he has turned all spinlocks into > mutexes, and when you really need an original spinlock, you > declare it with raw_spinlock_t. >
This one probably should be a raw_spinlock. This lock is only held to protect access to the queues. Since the queues are already priority ordered, there is little benefit to ordering -the order of insertion- in case of contention on a queue, compared with the complexity. Just what you want to say to a guy who says he is tired ;) Sven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/