On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:09:53AM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > On 12/15/14 2:08 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > >On 12/12/14 20:53, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >>Em Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:13:25AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > >>>On 12/12/14 6:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > >>>>Here is V3 of some more preparatory patches for Intel PT > >>>>that introduce an abstraction for Instruction tracing. > >> > >>>This is an x86-Intel only feature correct? If that is the case then the > >>>code > >>>should be not compiled for other architectures. > > > >It is not that simple. In the case of recording, it is not needed for > >architectures that don't support it, but in the case of session processing > >any architecture can (or should be able to) process the perf.data file of > >any other architecture. > > Understood. perf is a kitchen sink tool and the size of binaries for > embedded deployments is getting out of hand. e.g., for our PPC based systems > the entire root filesystem is 46M with perf taking up almost 3M of that > (stripped size too). New features need config options so user's can decide > the feature scope of what they are building. And we need to get the kconfig > style builds committed as well.
yep.. I'm on that kconfig stuff ;-) jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
