On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:56:24AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -1728,6 +1728,9 @@ static int setup_swap_extents(struct swap_info_struct
> *sis, sector_t *span)
> }
>
> if (mapping->a_ops->swap_activate) {
> + if (!mapping->a_ops->direct_IO)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + swap_file->f_flags |= O_DIRECT;
> ret = mapping->a_ops->swap_activate(sis, swap_file, span);
> if (!ret) {
> sis->flags |= SWP_FILE;
This needs to hold swap_file->f_lock, but otherwise looks good.
> This seems to be more or less equivalent to doing a fcntl(F_SETFL) to
> add the O_DIRECT flag to swap_file (which is a struct file *). Swapoff
> calls filp_close on swap_file, so I don't see why it's necessary to
> clear the flag.
filp_lose doesn't nessecarily destroy the file structure, there might be
other reference to it, e.g. from dup() or descriptor passing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
