On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > As far as I'm aware there's a general concensus that functions that are > responsible for freeing resources should be able to cope with being passed > a NULL pointer. This makes sense as it removes the need for all callers to
In general I'd only do this when most of the callers are doing the NULL check. As that seems to be the case here, I agree with your change. I've applied it to my tree. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
