Hello Al,
On 12/26/14 2:56 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:50:23PM -0800, Alex Gartrell wrote:
Currently the "is-socket" test for a file compares the ops table pointer,
which is static and local to the socket.c. Instead, this adds a flag for
private_data_is_socket. This is an exceptionally long commit message for a
two-line patch.
NAK. Don't crap into struct file, please.
I don't disagree with your sentiment here. Is the additional f_op
approach less gross or do you have something else in mind?
Thanks,
--
Alex Gartrell <agartr...@fb.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
