On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 01:11:16AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
Good catch, queued for 3.20.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> index 70a09f8..7086f83 100644
> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ In summary:
> However, they do -not- guarantee any other sort of ordering:
> Not prior loads against later loads, nor prior stores against
> later anything. If you need these other forms of ordering,
> - use smb_rmb(), smp_wmb(), or, in the case of prior stores and
> + use smp_rmb(), smp_wmb(), or, in the case of prior stores and
> later loads, smp_mb().
>
> (*) If both legs of the "if" statement begin with identical stores
> --
> 2.1.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
