Nizam, You made a lot of mistakes in this patch submission :(
Specifically, you should never include a patch as an attachment [2], and your subject line should say [PATCH] [2]. If you want to learn how to correctly submit patches I recommend watching this [1], reading this [2], and signing up for this [3]. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLBrBBImJt4 [2]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches [3]: http://www.eudyptula-challenge.org/ On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 01:27:40AM +0530, Nizam Haider wrote: > > From 00454f12a304489125bbdfbc2f50de3c2b9d49d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Nizam Haider <nizamhaider...@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 00:24:38 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Spi: spi-gpio: fixed spaces coding style issue > > Fixed a coding style issue. > > Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider <nizamhaider...@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c > index aee4e75..702b0b8 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct spi_gpio { > > /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/ > > -static inline struct spi_gpio * __pure > +static inline struct spi_gpio *__pure > spi_to_spi_gpio(const struct spi_device *spi) > { > const struct spi_bitbang *bang; > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ spi_to_spi_gpio(const struct spi_device *spi) > return spi_gpio; > } > > -static inline struct spi_gpio_platform_data * __pure > +static inline struct spi_gpio_platform_data *__pure > spi_to_pdata(const struct spi_device *spi) > { > return &spi_to_spi_gpio(spi)->pdata; > -- > 1.8.1.4 > -- - Jeremiah Mahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
