On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2015-01-04 15:03:02, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > If that is still unacceptable to you for whatever reason, then the least > > wrong compromize should be: > > > > seq_printf(m, "BogoMIPS\t: 1.00\n"); > > > > That'D allow for those broken applications to run while making clear > > that the provided value is phony. I was about to suggest 0.00 but that > > could trigger a divide by zero error somewhere I suppose. > > I don't know what 1.00 will cause, and neither do you, so what about > simply reverting the bad patch?
Because the patch wasn't "bad". It did solve a recurring support problem where people did actually complain on the list because the value was not what they would have liked. Removing this meaningless value did actually fix that support issue as no more complaints came through for the last 1.3 year, and is actually the only way for user space to be fixed too. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
