On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 07:07:41AM -0500, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:43:56PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 01/11/2015 09:36 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > > +
> > > + switch (dev->family) {
> > > + case KVASER_LEAF:
> > > + rx_msg = msg->u.leaf.rx_can.msg;
> > > + break;
> > > + case KVASER_USBCAN:
> > > + rx_msg = msg->u.usbcan.rx_can.msg;
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + dev_err(dev->udev->dev.parent,
> > > + "Invalid device family (%d)\n", dev->family);
> > > return;
> >
> > should not happen.
> >
>
> Yes, but otherwise I get GCC warnings of 'rx_msg' possibly
> being unused. I can add __maybe_unused to rx_msg of course,
> but such annotation may hide possible errors in the future.
>
Ah, what I meant is using uninitialized_var() to suppress the
GCC warning. But, really, using that macro has a bad history
of hiding errors in the future.
Kindly check http://lwn.net/Articles/529954/ for context.
Another solution might be initializing rx_msg to NULL.
> > > + switch (dev->family) {
> > > + case KVASER_LEAF:
> > > + msg_tx_can_flags = &msg->u.tx_can.leaf.flags;
> > > + break;
> > > + case KVASER_USBCAN:
> > > + msg_tx_can_flags = &msg->u.tx_can.usbcan.flags;
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + dev_err(dev->udev->dev.parent,
> > > + "Invalid device family (%d)\n", dev->family);
> > > + goto releasebuf;
> > should not happen, please remove
>
> Like the 'rx_msg' case above.
>
> Thanks,
> Darwish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
