Hello, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:19:09PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > The Mapping of the *online* cpus to nodes is already maintained by numa code. > > What the workqueue needs is a special Mapping: > The Mapping of the *possible* cpus to nodes > > But this mapping (if the numa code maintain it) is a trouble: > "possible" implies the mapping is stable/constant/immutable, it is hard > to > ensure it in the numa code. > > if mutability of this mapping is acceptable, we just move 20~40 LOC > of code from workqueue to numa code, all the other complexities > about it are still in workqueue.c.
Make numa code maintain the mapping to the best of its knowledge and invoke notification callbacks when it changes. Even if that involves slightly more code, that's the right thing to do at this point. This puts the logic which is complicated by the fact that the mapping may change where it's caused not some random unrelated place. It'd be awesome if somebody more familiar with the numa side can chime in and explain why this mapping change can't be avoided. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
