Le 13/01/2015 19:46, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> Some interrupt controllers are multiplexing several peripheral IRQs on
> a single interrupt line.
> While this is not a problem for most IRQs (as long as all peripherals
> request the interrupt with IRQF_SHARED flag set), multiplexing timers and
> other type of peripherals will generate a WARNING (mixing IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
> and !IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is prohibited).
>
> Create a dumb irq demultiplexer which simply forwards interrupts to all
> peripherals (exactly what's happening with IRQ_SHARED) but keep a unique
> irq number for each peripheral, thus preventing the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
> and !IRQF_NO_SUSPEND mix on a given interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 4 ++
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-dumb-demux.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/irq.h | 49 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 1 +
> kernel/irq/Kconfig | 5 ++
> kernel/irq/Makefile | 1 +
> kernel/irq/chip.c | 41 ++++++++++++
> kernel/irq/dumb-demux-chip.c | 140
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/irq/handle.c | 31 ++++++++-
> kernel/irq/internals.h | 3 +
> 11 files changed, 344 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-dumb-demux.c
> create mode 100644 kernel/irq/dumb-demux-chip.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index cc79d2a..8a9df88 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ config BRCMSTB_L2_IRQ
> select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
>
> +config DUMB_DEMUX_IRQ
> + bool
> + select DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP
> +
> config DW_APB_ICTL
> bool
> select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 9516a32..77f3c51 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += irq-armada-370-xp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXS) += irq-mxs.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C24XX) += irq-s3c24xx.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DW_APB_ICTL) += irq-dw-apb-ictl.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DUMB_DEMUX_IRQ) += irq-dumb-demux.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_METAG) += irq-metag-ext.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_METAG_PERFCOUNTER_IRQS) += irq-metag.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MOXART) += irq-moxart.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-dumb-demux.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-dumb-demux.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..dfa05ce
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-dumb-demux.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
Maybe add a little file header here. It's always better.
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "irqchip.h"
> +
> +static int __init dumb_irq_demux_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_dumb_demux *demux;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + u32 valid_irqs;
> + int ret;
> +
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + if (!irq) {
> + pr_err("Failed to retrieve dumb irq demuxer source\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "irqs", &valid_irqs);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Invalid of missing 'irqs' property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + demux = irq_alloc_dumb_demux_chip(irq, valid_irqs,
> + IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE |
> + IRQ_NOAUTOEN, 0, 0);
> + if (!demux) {
> + pr_err("Failed to allocate dumb irq demuxer struct\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + demux->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, BITS_PER_LONG,
> + &irq_dumb_demux_domain_ops,
> + demux);
> + if (!demux->domain) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_free_demux;
> + }
> +
> + ret = irq_set_handler_data(irq, demux);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Failed to assign handler data\n");
> + goto err_free_domain;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler(irq, irq_dumb_demux_handler);
> +
> + /*
> + * Disable the src irq (automatically enabled by
> + * irq_set_chained_handler) to prevent irqs from happening while
> + * nobody requested any of the demuxed irqs.
> + */
> + disable_irq(irq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_free_domain:
> + irq_domain_remove(demux->domain);
> +
> +err_free_demux:
> + kfree(demux);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(dumb_irq_demux, "irqchip-dumb-demux",
> dumb_irq_demux_of_init);
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index d09ec7a..ae8fa21 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -445,6 +445,10 @@ extern void handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct
> irq_desc *desc);
> extern void handle_edge_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void handle_edge_eoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void handle_simple_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP
> +extern irqreturn_t handle_dumb_demux_irq(unsigned int irq,
> + struct irq_desc *desc);
> +#endif
> extern void handle_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void handle_percpu_devid_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void handle_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
> @@ -862,4 +866,49 @@ static inline u32 irq_reg_readl(struct irq_chip_generic
> *gc,
> return readl(gc->reg_base + reg_offset);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * enum irq_dumb_demux_flags - Initialization flags for generic irq chips
> + * @IRQ_DD_INIT_NESTED_LOCK: Set the lock class of the irqs to nested for
> + * irq chips which need to call irq_set_wake() on
> + * the parent irq. Usually GPIO implementations
> + */
> +enum irq_dumb_demux_flags {
> + IRQ_DD_INIT_NESTED_LOCK = 1 << 0,
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP
> +/**
> + * struct irq_chip_dumb_demux - Dumb demultiplexer irq chip data structure
> + * @domain: irq domain pointer
> + * @available: Bitfield of valid irqs
> + * @unmasked: Bitfield containing irqs status
> + * @flags: irq_dumb_demux_flags flags
> + * @src_irq: irq feeding the dumb demux chip
> + *
> + * Note, that irq_chip_generic can have multiple irq_chip_type
> + * implementations which can be associated to a particular irq line of
> + * an irq_chip_generic instance. That allows to share and protect
> + * state in an irq_chip_generic instance when we need to implement
> + * different flow mechanisms (level/edge) for it.
> + */
> +struct irq_chip_dumb_demux {
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + unsigned long available;
> + unsigned long unmasked;
> + unsigned int flags;
> + unsigned int src_irq;
> + unsigned int irq_flags_to_clear;
> + unsigned int irq_flags_to_set;
> +};
> +
> +void irq_dumb_demux_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc);
> +
> +struct irq_chip_dumb_demux *
> +irq_alloc_dumb_demux_chip(unsigned int src_irq,
> + unsigned long valid_irqs,
> + unsigned int clr_flags,
> + unsigned int set_flags,
> + unsigned int dd_flags);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP */
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_IRQ_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 676d730..1de3808 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
> };
>
> extern struct irq_domain_ops irq_generic_chip_ops;
> +extern struct irq_domain_ops irq_dumb_demux_domain_ops;
>
> struct irq_domain_chip_generic;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/Kconfig b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> index 9a76e3b..d01554a 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ config GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> bool
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
>
> +# Dumb interrupt demuxer chip implementation
> +config DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP
> + bool
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> +
> # Generic irq_domain hw <--> linux irq number translation
> config IRQ_DOMAIN
> bool
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/Makefile b/kernel/irq/Makefile
> index d121235..1cd4e42 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/irq/Makefile
> @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ) += migration.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += pm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ) += msi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP) += dumb-demux-chip.o
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index 6f1c7a5..d2a5c96 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -405,6 +405,47 @@ out_unlock:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_simple_irq);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP
> +/**
> + * handle_dumb_demux_irq - Dumb demuxer irq handle function.
> + * @irq: the interrupt number
> + * @desc: the interrupt description structure for this irq
> + *
> + * Dumb demux interrupts are sent from a demultiplexing interrupt handler
> + * which is not able to decide which child interrupt interrupt handler
typo: "interrupt interrupt"
> + * should be called.
> + *
> + * Note: The caller is expected to handle the ack, clear, mask and
> + * unmask issues if necessary.
> + */
> +irqreturn_t
> +handle_dumb_demux_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + irqreturn_t retval = IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
> +
> + if (!irq_may_run(desc))
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + desc->istate &= ~(IRQS_REPLAY | IRQS_WAITING);
> + kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irq, desc);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!desc->action || irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data))) {
> + desc->istate |= IRQS_PENDING;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + retval = handle_irq_event_no_spurious_check(desc);
> +
> +out_unlock:
> + raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_dumb_demux_irq);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP */
> +
> /*
> * Called unconditionally from handle_level_irq() and only for oneshot
> * interrupts from handle_fasteoi_irq()
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/dumb-demux-chip.c b/kernel/irq/dumb-demux-chip.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8e2de1d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/irq/dumb-demux-chip.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> +/*
> + * Library implementing common dumb irq demux chip functions
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015, Boris Brezillon
License here, please.
> + */
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
> +
> +#include "internals.h"
> +
> +static void irq_dumb_demux_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_dumb_demux *demux = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +
> + clear_bit(d->hwirq, &demux->unmasked);
> +
> + if (!demux->unmasked)
> + disable_irq_nosync(demux->src_irq);
> +}
> +
> +static void irq_dumb_demux_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_dumb_demux *demux = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + bool enable_src_irq = !demux->unmasked;
Why this additional "bool" unlike the other function above?
> +
> + set_bit(d->hwirq, &demux->unmasked);
> +
> + if (enable_src_irq)
> + enable_irq(demux->src_irq);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip irq_dumb_demux_chip = {
> + .name = "dumb-demux-irq",
> + .irq_mask = irq_dumb_demux_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = irq_dumb_demux_unmask,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Separate lockdep class for interrupt chip which can nest irq_desc
> + * lock.
> + */
> +static struct lock_class_key irq_nested_lock_class;
> +
> +/*
> + * irq_map_dumb_demux_chip - Map a dumb demux chip for an irq domain
> + */
> +static int irq_map_dumb_demux_chip(struct irq_domain *d,
> + unsigned int virq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw_irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_dumb_demux *demux = d->host_data;
> +
> + if (!test_bit(hw_irq, &demux->available))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (demux->flags & IRQ_DD_INIT_NESTED_LOCK)
> + irq_set_lockdep_class(virq, &irq_nested_lock_class);
> +
> + irq_set_chip(virq, &irq_dumb_demux_chip);
> + irq_set_chip_data(virq, demux);
> + irq_modify_status(virq, demux->irq_flags_to_clear,
> + demux->irq_flags_to_set);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct irq_domain_ops irq_dumb_demux_domain_ops = {
> + .map = irq_map_dumb_demux_chip,
> + .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onecell,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_dumb_demux_domain_ops);
> +
> +/**
> + * irq_dumb_demux_handler - Dumb demux flow handler
> + * @irq: Virtual irq number
> + * @irq_desc: irq descriptor
> + */
> +void irq_dumb_demux_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_dumb_demux *demux = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> + int i;
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &demux->unmasked, BITS_PER_LONG) {
> + int demuxed_irq = irq_find_mapping(demux->domain, i);
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(demuxed_irq);
> +
> + ret |= handle_dumb_demux_irq(demuxed_irq, desc);
> + }
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +
> + if (!noirqdebug)
> + note_interrupt(irq, desc, ret);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_dumb_demux_handler);
> +
> +/**
> + * irq_alloc_dumb_demux_chip - Allocate a dumb demux chip
> + * @src_irq: irq feeding the dumb demux chip
> + * @dd_flags: irq_dumb_demux_flags flags
> + * @valid_irqs: Bitmask representing valid irqs
> + * @clr_flags: irq_flags to clear when mapping an interrupt
> + * @set_flags: irq_flags to set when mapping an interrupt
Nit. not same order as the function parameters...
> + */
> +struct irq_chip_dumb_demux *
> +irq_alloc_dumb_demux_chip(unsigned int src_irq,
> + unsigned long valid_irqs,
> + unsigned int clr_flags,
> + unsigned int set_flags,
> + unsigned int dd_flags)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_dumb_demux *demux;
> +
> + if (!src_irq)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + demux = kzalloc(sizeof(*demux), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!demux)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + demux->available = valid_irqs;
> + demux->flags = dd_flags;
> + demux->src_irq = src_irq;
> + demux->irq_flags_to_clear = clr_flags;
> + demux->irq_flags_to_set = set_flags;
> +
> + return demux;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_alloc_dumb_demux_chip);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> index 6354802..f786850 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,8 @@ void __irq_wake_thread(struct irq_desc *desc, struct
> irqaction *action)
> }
>
> irqreturn_t
> -handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
> +handle_irq_event_percpu_no_spurious_check(struct irq_desc *desc,
> + struct irqaction *action)
> {
> irqreturn_t retval = IRQ_NONE;
> unsigned int flags = 0, irq = desc->irq_data.irq;
> @@ -175,8 +176,18 @@ handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, struct
> irqaction *action)
>
> add_interrupt_randomness(irq, flags);
>
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> +irqreturn_t
> +handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
> +{
> + irqreturn_t retval;
> +
> + retval = handle_irq_event_percpu_no_spurious_check(desc, action);
> +
> if (!noirqdebug)
> - note_interrupt(irq, desc, retval);
> + note_interrupt(desc->irq_data.irq, desc, retval);
> return retval;
> }
>
> @@ -195,3 +206,19 @@ irqreturn_t handle_irq_event(struct irq_desc *desc)
> irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_no_spurious_check(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irqaction *action = desc->action;
> + irqreturn_t ret;
> +
> + desc->istate &= ~IRQS_PENDING;
> + irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
> + raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> +
> + ret = handle_irq_event_percpu_no_spurious_check(desc, action);
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
> + irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> index df553b0..fe056fb 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ extern void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int
> node, int nr);
>
> irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction
> *action);
> irqreturn_t handle_irq_event(struct irq_desc *desc);
> +irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_percpu_no_spurious_check(struct irq_desc *desc,
> + struct irqaction *action);
> +irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_no_spurious_check(struct irq_desc *desc);
>
> /* Resending of interrupts :*/
> void check_irq_resend(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq);
Otherwise, it look okay to me:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com>
I'm still a little bit frighten about the additional latency added to
the timer interrupt. But if it's a valid way to solve the problem for
these older SoCs, I'm for it...
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
