* Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:59:26PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Hi Ingo and Thomas,
> > 
> > At Linus' suggestion, I'm trying out some maintainerish stuff for x86
> > entry code.  Please consider pulling to an appropriate branch *after
> > Paul sends his RCU pull request*, only if 734d16801349 is included in
> > that pull request.  If this goes well, maybe I'll submit a MAINTAINERS
> > patch, too.
> > 
> > IMPORTANT: This is based on an RCU change that you don't have yet.  I
> > think that Paul is planning on sending a pull request with that change
> > fairly soon.  The code in here would compile without that fix, but it
> > would introduce a nasty regression, so, to avoid breaking bisection, I
> > based this off of the relevant change in Paul's tree.  (It's the very
> > first change for 3.20 in his current queue.)
> 
> Yep, should happen by early next week, if it survives this weekend's
> testing.  ;-)

Ok, I'll first wait for that pull request to arrive then.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to