On 7/6/05, Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff -ruNp 300-reboot-handler-hook.patch-old/kernel/sys.c
> 300-reboot-handler-hook.patch-new/kernel/sys.c
> --- 300-reboot-handler-hook.patch-old/kernel/sys.c 2005-06-20
> 11:47:32.000000000 +1000
> +++ 300-reboot-handler-hook.patch-new/kernel/sys.c 2005-07-04
> 23:14:18.000000000 +1000
> @@ -436,12 +436,12 @@ asmlinkage long sys_reboot(int magic1, i
> machine_restart(buffer);
> break;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND2
> case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_SW_SUSPEND:
> {
> - int ret = software_suspend();
> + suspend2_try_suspend();
> unlock_kernel();
> - return ret;
Are both mechanisms intended to live in the kernel? If not, where's
the patch to remove the old code?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
