On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I saw roughly 5% win in a fast-path loop over kmem_cache_alloc/free > > in CONFIG_PREEMPT. (14.821 ns -> 14.049 ns) > > I'm surprised. preempt_disable/enable are pretty fast. I wonder why > this makes a measurable difference. Perhaps preempt_enable()'s call to > preempt_schedule() added pain?
The rest of the fastpath is already highly optimized. That is why something like preempt enable/disable has such a disproportionate effect. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
