Hi. On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:22, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > diff -ruNp > > 604-utility-header.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h > > 604-utility-header.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h > > --- 604-utility-header.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h > > 1970-01-01 10:00:00.000000000 +1000 > > +++ 604-utility-header.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h > > 2005-07-05 23:48:59.000000000 +1000 > > Please do move these.
Okay. > > + > > +extern int suspend_snprintf(char * buffer, int buffer_size, const char > > *fmt, ...); > > What's wrong with regular snprintf? If there's a buffer overrun, it returns the number of bytes it wanted to use, not the number actually used. Regards, Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
