On Wednesday 06 Jul 2005 18:27, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > great! Do the softlockup warnings still occur? > > > > Yes, but in no greater a number. > > could you apply the patch below, so that we can see what kind of time > gap the softlockup detector encountered? > > Ingo >
Interesting. They're both exactly 10001 jiffies apart. BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! -283805--293806 [<c010421f>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x30 (20) [<c01449d7>] softlockup_tick+0x97/0xc0 (32) [<c0108607>] timer_interrupt+0x57/0x100 (20) [<c0144c85>] handle_IRQ_event+0x85/0x110 (52) [<c0144dea>] __do_IRQ+0xda/0x170 (44) [<c0105b15>] do_IRQ+0x65/0xa0 (920170428) ======================= [<c0103ceb>] common_interrupt+0x1f/0x24 (-925676316) ------------------------------ | showing all locks held by: | (usb.agent/2424 [f7140800, 125]): ------------------------------ BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! -251889--261890 [<c010421f>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x30 (20) [<c01449d7>] softlockup_tick+0x97/0xc0 (32) [<c0108607>] timer_interrupt+0x57/0x100 (20) [<c0144c85>] handle_IRQ_event+0x85/0x110 (52) [<c0144dea>] __do_IRQ+0xda/0x170 (44) [<c0105b15>] do_IRQ+0x65/0xa0 (-196752) ======================= [<c0103ceb>] common_interrupt+0x1f/0x24 (96) [<c0101145>] cpu_idle+0x65/0x90 (16) [<c03b0902>] start_kernel+0x182/0x1c0 (32) [<c010019f>] 0xc010019f (1076011023) ------------------------------ | showing all locks held by: | (swapper/0 [c035de00, 140]): ------------------------------ Note the minus sign -- this is only just into the boot process. -- Cheers, Alistair. personal: alistair()devzero!co!uk university: s0348365()sms!ed!ac!uk student: CS/CSim Undergraduate contact: 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh. EH8 9PP. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/