On systems which don't implement sys_execveat(), this test produces a
lot of output.

Add a check at the beginning to see if the syscall is present, and if
not just note one error and return.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/exec/execveat.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/execveat.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/execveat.c
index e238c9559caf..b87e4a843bea 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/execveat.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/execveat.c
@@ -234,6 +234,14 @@ static int run_tests(void)
        int fd_cloexec = open_or_die("execveat", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC);
        int fd_script_cloexec = open_or_die("script", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC);
 
+       /* Check if we have execveat at all, and bail early if not */
+       errno = 0;
+       execveat_(-1, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0);
+       if (errno == -ENOSYS) {
+               printf("[FAIL] ENOSYS calling execveat - no kernel support?\n");
+               return 1;
+       }
+
        /* Change file position to confirm it doesn't affect anything */
        lseek(fd, 10, SEEK_SET);
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to