On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:27:33 -0800
Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 17:24 +0300, Sergey Dyasly wrote:
> > Now it's preferable to use for_each_thread() instead of while_each_thread().
> > Add a check to checkpatch.pl in order to prevent any new usages of the buggy
> > while_each_thread() when possible.
> []
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > @@ -3255,6 +3255,12 @@ sub process {
> > "Prefer dev_$level(... to dev_printk(KERN_$orig,
> > ...\n" . $herecurr);
> > }
> >
> > +# Check for the buggy while_each_thread()
> > + if ($line =~ /\bwhile_each_thread\(/) {
>
> \bwhile_each_thread\s*\(
> or maybe
> \bwhile_each_thread\b
>
> > + WARN("WHILE_EACH_THREAD",
> > + "Prefer to use for_each_thread() instead of the
> > buggy while_each_thread(). See commit
> > 0c740d0afc3bff0a097ad03a1c8df92757516f5c for details.\n" . $herecurr);
>
> Pretty long commit id, 12 is probably enough.
"\bwhile_each_thread\s*\(" and 12-digit commit id sound reasonable, thanks.
I'll update the patch.
--
Sergey Dyasly <dse...@gmail.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
